There are clear rules about accessibility when it comes to businesses and personal housing, but things get a bit more gray when a shared space becomes involved.
Whether it's a roommate situation or a room rental agreement, things can get dicy when the boundaries and expectations are unclear.
A homeowner posted the question looking for clarity on who is in the wrong in the scenario.
For anonymity, she chose to post the question under a fake account named Throwawaylandlord43, so for the sake of clarity in telling the story, I'll just call her Landlord.
Her great aunt had been in a wheelchair and had the entire main floor converted to be accessible, but never bothered to extend the renovations to the upper level.
Landlord herself moved in at 14 and got the whole top floor to herself.
Since she wasn't using the two lower bedrooms that used to belong to her great aunt, she decided to try renting them out for a bit of extra income.
When a young man named Brian, who uses a wheelchair, expressed interest in renting both rooms, she thought it was perfect.
She was happy to provide an accessible home for someone in a similar situation as her great aunt.
At first, this seemed to be a great arrangement.
"We've been living together since June, and we get along pretty well," she said, "He's a nice guy."
She told him that she didn't think she needed to because there was nothing up there he required access to, but he keeps on insisting.
However, Landlord doesn't think she's out of line and cannot figure out why Brian would even want to go up there in the first place.
There is also a private ensuite off one of his rooms and a second guest bathroom on the main floor.
Upstairs is two other bedrooms, one of which Landlord uses as her office, and another bathroom that was presumably never renovated with wheelchair access in mind.
She says that she's also got a mini-fridge and a microwave up in her office for days when she doesn't feel like going downstairs.
So why would Brian want to go up there and is she in the wrong for not making the upstairs accessible to him?
"NTA-There’s no reason he needs to be going upstairs. The part of the house he is renting is in fact accessible," said GothPenguin, adding, "I feel the need to caution you however. The fact that he is a wheelchair user doesn’t mean he would be incapable of causing you harm."
Tikithing said about the stairs: "It's not about accessibility here, they're just a clearly defined boundary.
As the owner of the home, Landlord is allowed to set the rules about what is a "common area" and what isn't.
However, many made the reasonable recommendation that Landlord double-check the exact wording on the rental agreement she and Brian signed, just in case.
Janefryer summed it up best:
"If he persists in trying to get up into her private space; she has the right to evict him. She isn't being discriminatory against him, and has provided him with the ideal rental; so the least he could do is to respect the boundaries that he agreed to, at the time he signed the contract. He doesn't have the right to make his landlord feel uncomfortable and afraid."
Ultimately, his wheelchair is irrelevant to the underlying issue.
Had he the use of his legs and the access to her private space was blocked by a locked door, he would be out of line to insist on being given a key.
But what do you think?
h/t: Reddit
